Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference in selinux_inode_permission()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:10 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: 
> On 01/09/2014 11:05 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > [adding lsm and selinux]
> > 
> > Am I just crazy, or was this bug discussed (and obviously not fixed)
> > some time ago?
> > 
> > VFS can still use inodes after security_inode_free_security() was
> > called...
> 
> I didn't know that was the case; originally when we added the hook it
> was not possible.   I have seen a Red Hat bugzilla report about it,
> but no upstream discussion.

For those of us that don't have access to the RH bugzilla, can someone
please summarize the problem?

thanks,

Mimi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]