[PATCH 3.16 114/129] It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



3.16.70-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit b761dcf1217760a42f7897c31dcb649f59b2333e upstream.

In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to
sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk
at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data
corruption.

Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -4506,7 +4506,6 @@ bio_full:
 	atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
 	read_bio->bi_next = NULL;
 	generic_make_request(read_bio);
-	sector_nr += nr_sectors;
 	sectors_done += nr_sectors;
 	if (sector_nr <= last)
 		goto read_more;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux