On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:56:21AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 01/07/2014 12:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > >>> On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release. > >>>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>>> let me know. > >>>> > >>>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 8 22:37:25 UTC 2014. > >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >>>> > >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz > >>>> and the diffstat can be found below. > >>>> > >>>> thanks, > >>>> > >>>> greg k-h > >>> > >>> Patches testing - passed > >>> Compile testing - passed > >>> Boot testing - passed > >>> dmesg regression testing - passed > >>> > >>> Test systems > >>> > >>> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later) > >>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics > >>> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 > >>> > >>> Detailed test status > >>> > >>> Patches applied cleanly > >>> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this > >>> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. > >> > >> Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1 > >> announcement, sorry :) > >> > > > > 3.10.26-rc2 and 3.12.7-rc2 are looking good on all my 3 test systems. No dmesg regressions. > > > Same here. Great, thanks to both of you for testing and letting me know. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html