From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit fe121ee531d1362810bfd30f38a1b88b1d3d376c ]
When using 32-bit subregisters (ALU32), the RISC-V JIT would not clear
the high 32-bits of the target register and therefore generate
incorrect code.
E.g., in the following code:
$ cat test.c
unsigned int f(unsigned long long a,
unsigned int b)
{
return (unsigned int)a & b;
}
$ clang-9 -target bpf -O2 -emit-llvm -S test.c -o - | \
llc-9 -mattr=+alu32 -mcpu=v3
.text
.file "test.c"
.globl f
.p2align 3
.type f,@function
f:
r0 = r1
w0 &= w2
exit
.Lfunc_end0:
.size f, .Lfunc_end0-f
The JIT would not clear the high 32-bits of r0 after the
and-operation, which in this case might give an incorrect return
value.
After this patch, that is not the case, and the upper 32-bits are
cleared.
Reported-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 80b12aa5e10d..e5c8d675bd6e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -759,14 +759,20 @@ static int emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
emit(rv_and(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
+ if (!is64)
+ emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
emit(rv_or(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
+ if (!is64)
+ emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
emit(rv_xor(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
+ if (!is64)
+ emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
--
2.20.1
