On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > A number of NUMA balancing patches were tagged for -stable but I got a > number of rejected mails from either Greg or his robot minion. The list > of relevant patches is > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: serialise parallel get_user_page against THP" > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: call MMU notifiers on THP migration" > MERGED: Patch "mm: clear pmd_numa before invalidating" > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: do not clear PMD during PTE update scan" > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: do not clear PTE for pte_numa update" > MERGED: Patch "mm: numa: ensure anon_vma is locked to prevent parallel THP splits" > MERGED: Patch "mm: numa: avoid unnecessary work on the failure path" > MERGED: Patch "sched: numa: skip inaccessible VMAs" > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: clear numa hinting information on mprotect" > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: avoid unnecessary disruption of NUMA hinting during" > Patch "mm: fix TLB flush race between migration, and change_protection_range" > Patch "mm: numa: guarantee that tlb_flush_pending updates are visible before page table updates" > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: defer TLB flush for THP migration as long as" > > Fixing the rejects one at a time may cause other conflicts due to ordering > issues. Instead, this patch series against 3.12.6 is the full list of > backported patches in the expected order. Greg, unfortunately this means > you may have to drop some patches already in your stable tree and reapply > but on the plus side they should be then in the correct order for bisection > purposes and you'll know I've tested this combination of patches. Many thanks for these, I'll go queue them up in a bit and drop the others to ensure I got all of this correct. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html