Re: Request for 4.19.x backport (with conflicts)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/21/19 9:11 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
Hello Laura,

We're attempting to build stable kernels with gcc9. 4.19.x fails to build with
gcc9 as 146448524bdd ("s390/jump_label: Use "jdd" constraint on gcc9") is missing.
This doesn't apply cleanly to 4.19.x as it needs changes from 13ddb52c165b
("s390/jump_label: Switch to relative references")

Which is better, taking both 13ddb52c165b and 146448524bdd or doing
a backport of 146448524bdd?

I don't know which kernel version you are referring to exactly,
however 4.19.53 from linux-stable does not contain the common code
infrastructure for relative jump labels. The infrastructure was merged
with 4.20: commit 50ff18ab497aa ("jump_label: Implement generic
support for relative references").

Therefore a backport of only 146448524bdd seems to be the way to go.


Ah okay, I didn't realize there was more needed, I was just looking at
the clean cherry-pick. I'm not sure how to do the backport, if you
give me the patch I can verify.

Thanks,
Laura



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux