Re: [PATCH 1/3] resource: Fix locking in find_next_iomem_res()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 07:14:53PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
On Jun 15, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: ff3cc952d3f0 resource: Add remove_resource interface.

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.9, v4.19.50, v4.14.125, v4.9.181.

v5.1.9: Build OK!
v4.19.50: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
   010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue")
   a98959fdbda1 ("resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces")

v4.14.125: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
   010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue")
   0e4c12b45aa8 ("x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages")
   1d2e733b13b4 ("resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback")
   4ac2aed837cb ("resource: Consolidate resource walking code")
   a98959fdbda1 ("resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces")

v4.9.181: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
   010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue")
   0e4c12b45aa8 ("x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages")
   1d2e733b13b4 ("resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback")
   4ac2aed837cb ("resource: Consolidate resource walking code")
   60fe3910bb02 ("kexec_file: Allow arch-specific memory walking for kexec_add_buffer")
   a0458284f062 ("powerpc: Add support code for kexec_file_load()")
   a98959fdbda1 ("resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces")
   da6658859b9c ("powerpc: Change places using CONFIG_KEXEC to use CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE instead.")
   ec2b9bfaac44 ("kexec_file: Change kexec_add_buffer to take kexec_buf as argument.")

Is there a reason 010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res()
iteration issue”) was not backported?

Mostly because it's not tagged for stable :)

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux