> On Jun 15, 2019, at 3:16 PM, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: ff3cc952d3f0 resource: Add remove_resource interface.
This commit (Patch 3/3) does not have the “Fixes:” tag (and it is a
performance enhancement), so I don’t know why it was processed.
IOW: please do not backport it.
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.9, v4.19.50, v4.14.125, v4.9.181.
>
> v5.1.9: Build OK!
> v4.19.50: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue")
> 7a53bb309eb3 ("resource: Fix locking in find_next_iomem_res()")
> a98959fdbda1 ("resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces")
>
> v4.14.125: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue")
> 0e4c12b45aa8 ("x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages")
> 1d2e733b13b4 ("resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback")
> 4ac2aed837cb ("resource: Consolidate resource walking code")
> 7a53bb309eb3 ("resource: Fix locking in find_next_iomem_res()")
> a98959fdbda1 ("resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces")
>
> v4.9.181: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 010a93bf97c7 ("resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue")
> 0e4c12b45aa8 ("x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages")
> 1d2e733b13b4 ("resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback")
> 4ac2aed837cb ("resource: Consolidate resource walking code")
> 60fe3910bb02 ("kexec_file: Allow arch-specific memory walking for kexec_add_buffer")
> 7a53bb309eb3 ("resource: Fix locking in find_next_iomem_res()")
> a0458284f062 ("powerpc: Add support code for kexec_file_load()")
> a98959fdbda1 ("resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces")
> da6658859b9c ("powerpc: Change places using CONFIG_KEXEC to use CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE instead.")
> ec2b9bfaac44 ("kexec_file: Change kexec_add_buffer to take kexec_buf as argument.")
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
