Re: [PATCH v4.4 00/45] V4.4 backport of arm64 Spectre patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 08:37:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Here is an attempt to backport arm64 spectre patches to v4.4 stable
> tree.
> 
> I have started this backport with Mark Rutland's backport of Spectre to
> 4.9 [1] and tried applying the upstream version of them over 4.4 and
> resolved conflicts by checking how they have been resolved in 4.9.
> 
> I had to pick few extra upstream patches to avoid unnecessary conflicts
> (upstream commit ids mentioned):
> 
>   a842789837c0 arm64: remove duplicate macro __KERNEL__ check
>   64f8ebaf115b mm/kasan: add API to check memory regions
>   bffe1baff5d5 arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API
>   92406f0cc9e3 arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check
>   9eb8a2cdf65c arm64: cputype info for Broadcom Vulcan
>   0d90718871fe arm64: cputype: Add MIDR values for Cavium ThunderX2 CPUs
>   98dd64f34f47 ARM: 8478/2: arm/arm64: add arm-smccc
> 
> 
> I had to drop few patches as well as they weren't getting applied
> properly due to missing files/features (upstream commit id mentioned):
> 
>   93f339ef4175 arm64: cpufeature: __this_cpu_has_cap() shouldn't stop early
>   3c31fa5a06b4 arm64: Run enable method for errata work arounds on late CPUs
>   6840bdd73d07 arm64: KVM: Use per-CPU vector when BP hardening is enabled
>   90348689d500 arm64: KVM: Make PSCI_VERSION a fast path
> 
> 
> Since v4.4 doesn't contain arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c file, changes for
> it are dropped from some of the patches. The commit log of specific
> patches are updated with this information.
> 
> Also for commit id (from 4.9 stable):
>   c24c205d2528 arm64: Add ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support
> 
> I have dropped arch/arm64/crypto/sha256-core.S and sha512-core.S files
> as they weren't part of the upstream commit. Not sure why it was
> included by Mark as the commit log doesn't provide any reasoning for it.
> 
> The patches in this series are pushed here [2].
> 
> This is only build/boot tested by me as I don't have access to the
> required test-suite which can verify spectre mitigations.

Thanks for doing this work.

> @Julien: Can you please help reviewing / testing them ? Thanks.

Julien, I need yours, or someone from ARM to sign off on these patches
as working properly before I can accept them.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux