Hi Finn,
On 11/06/19 9:33 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Hi Finn,
IIRC I'd tested that change as well - didn't change broken target
behaviour but no regressions in other respects. Add my tested-by if
needed.
Unfortunately I can't confirm that this is the same patch as the one you
tested as I no longer have that commit. But Stan did test a wide variety
of targets and I'm confident that the reselection code path was covered.
No matter - patch applied cleanly to what I'm running on my Falcon, and
works just fine for now (stresstest will take a few hours to complete).
And that'll thoroughly exercise the reselection code path, from what
we've seen before.
Cheers,
Michael
