On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: 3a0f64bfa907 mac_scsi: Fix pseudo DMA implementation.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v4.19.48, v4.14.123, v4.9.180.
>
> v5.1.7: Build OK!
> v4.19.48: Build OK!
> v4.14.123: Build OK!
> v4.9.180: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 25894d1f98ae ("scsi: ncr5380: Improve hostdata struct member alignment and cache-ability")
> 4a98f896bf2c ("scsi: ncr5380: Use correct types for DMA routines")
> 61e1ce588b10 ("scsi: ncr5380: Use correct types for device register accessors")
> 820682b1b34e ("scsi: ncr5380: Store IO ports and addresses in host private data")
> abd12b09292c ("scsi: atari_scsi: Make device register accessors re-entrant")
> b61bacbc2bf5 ("scsi: g_NCR5380: Merge g_NCR5380 and g_NCR5380_mmio drivers")
> d4408dd7ecff ("scsi: ncr5380: Simplify register polling limit")
> d5d37a0ab13b ("scsi: ncr5380: Pass hostdata pointer to register polling routines")
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
Please don't backport to v4.9.y.
I added a Cc header in the hope of avoiding this question (Cc:
stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.14+) but it appears that this bot doesn't work
that way.
For this particular platform, v4.9.y would need quite a few patches to
bring it up to the same level of stability and functionality as v4.14.y or
v4.19.y. I don't really want to pursue that so I drew the line at v4.14.y.
Thanks.
--
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
>
