On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:31:46PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > > > > commit 5887a59961e2295c5b02f39dbc0ecf9212709b7b upstream. > > > > Not necessary on soc15 and breaks driver reload on server cards. > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.c > > @@ -495,6 +495,11 @@ int soc15_set_ip_blocks(struct amdgpu_de > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > + /* Just return false for soc15 GPUs. Reset does not seem to > > + * be necessary. > > + */ > > + return false; > > + > > if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) > > adev->nbio_funcs = &nbio_v7_0_funcs; > > else if (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA20) > > Something is seriously wrong here. > > Upstream commit goes to soc15_need_reset_on_init() and creates dead > variable and quite a bit of dead code. Is that intended? > > But this stable version... goes to different function, and returns > false in function returning 0/-EINVAL, simulating success. New place > does not seem right; it seems like patch misplaced it. Ah, good catch! This happened in the 4.14.y tree, so I had to drop the patch from there, for some reason I missed checking the 4.19.y backport (I had validated that 5.1.y got it right.) Now dropped from the queue, thanks! greg k-h
