Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 15:39, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:14 PM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 0:10, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:34 PM Paul Cercueil
<paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> The pin mappings introduced in commit 636f8ba67fb6
>> ("MIPS: JZ4740: Qi LB60: Add pinctrl configuration for several
>> drivers")
>> are completely wrong. The pinctrl driver name is incorrect, and
the
>> function and group fields are swapped.
>>
>> Fixes: 636f8ba67fb6 ("MIPS: JZ4740: Qi LB60: Add pinctrl
>> configuration for several drivers")
>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Such things happen. Are you planning to phase all the board files
over
> to use devicetree eventually?
Yes, that's definitely what's planned; right now the blockers are
patchsets [1] and [2]. [1] is ignored by everybody because there's
no
maintainer for drivers/memory/. [2] is a year-long effort that still
doesn't show me the light at the end of the tunnel.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/4/743
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/21/679
What? That's unacceptable, the last resort is usually to send the
patches to Andrew Morton (whether fair or not) when nothing gets
applied.
In this case I would however encourage the MIPS maintainer to
simply queue this stuff in the MIPS tree as blocking his arch work
if not merged, Ralf would you consider just queueing this?
I do not think the other Linus would mind.
It's not that critical - it's not blocking until [2] gets merged too.
But yes, it's been sitting idle for a while.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
