On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:04:53PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:28:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While reading the kernel logs for arm64 (as one does) I noticed a few > > patches that seemed like candidates for either LTS or LTSI. I've also > > had a couple of others mentioned via other routes. What do you think of > > these? > > > > 4ecf7ccb1973 arm64: spinlock: retry trylock operation if strex fails on free lock > > > > This seems like a correctness fix for spinlocks, though since the > > callers should cope with failure it's arguably just an optimisation. > > I've applied this one to 3.10-stable and will look over the others when > I catch up on my larger patch queue, thanks. All of the other ones looked good to me and I've queued them up now, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html