Re: [PATCH 3/4] ima: don't ignore INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN EVM status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/20/2019 11:20 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 18:12 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 52e6fbb042cc..80e1c233656b 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -1588,6 +1588,9 @@
  			Format: { "off" | "enforce" | "fix" | "log" }
  			default: "enforce"
+ ima_appraise_req_evm
+			[IMA] require EVM for appraisal with file digests.

As much as possible we want to limit the number of new boot command
line options as possible.  Is there a reason for not extending
"ima_appraise=" with "require-evm" or "enforce-evm"?

ima-appraise= can be disabled with CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM, which
probably is done when the system is in production.

Should I allow to use ima-appraise=require-evm even if
CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM=n?

Thanks

Roberto

--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux