From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 5e27f38f1f3f45a0c938299c3a34a2d2db77165a upstream.
If the rfc7539 template is instantiated with specific implementations,
e.g. "rfc7539(chacha20-generic,poly1305-generic)" rather than
"rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", then the implementation names end up
included in the instance's cra_name. This is incorrect because it then
prevents all users from allocating "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", if the
highest priority implementations of chacha20 and poly1305 were selected.
Also, the self-tests aren't run on an instance allocated in this way.
Fix it by setting the instance's cra_name from the underlying
algorithms' actual cra_names, rather than from the requested names.
This matches what other templates do.
Fixes: 71ebc4d1b27d ("crypto: chacha20poly1305 - Add a ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD construction, RFC7539")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.2+
Cc: Martin Willi <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Martin Willi <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
crypto/chacha20poly1305.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c
+++ b/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c
@@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ static int chachapoly_create(struct cryp
err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
- "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha_name,
- poly_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
+ "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_name,
+ poly->cra_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
goto out_drop_chacha;
if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_driver_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
"%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_driver_name,
