On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:25 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:28:48AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > It seems dax_iomap_actor() is not a path where we'd be worried about > > needing hardened user copy checks. > > I would agree: I think the proposed patch makes sense. :) Sounds like an acked-by to me.
