On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 03:58:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:49:25 -0500 > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > New version: > > > > > > x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions > > > > > > In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push > > > > Sorry to keep nitpicking, but "call functions" -> "function calls" would > > sound more accurate to me (in both subject and description). > > I disagree ;-) > > Matters how you look at it. I look at it as emulating the "call" > function, not a function call. Like emulating an "addl" function, or a > "jmp" function. > > See? I kind of see your point... but then you're overloading the meaning of the word "function", in a context where it clearly means something else. > To remove the ambiguity, I could replace "function" with "instruction". Yes, that would be much better :-) -- Josh
