On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:23 PM Jarkko Nikula
<jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ---
> Keijo: could you test this does it fix the issue you reported? This is
> practically the same diff I sent earlier what you probably haven't tested yet.
> I wanted to send a commitable fix in case it works since I'll be out of
> office in a few coming days.
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 38af18645133..8149c9e32b69 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>
> if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_HOST_NOTIFY) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "Using Host Notify IRQ\n");
> + /* Keep adapter active when Host Notify is required */
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->adapter->dev);
> irq = i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(client);
> } else if (dev->of_node) {
> irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "irq");
> @@ -431,6 +433,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
>
> client->irq = client->init_irq;
> + if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_HOST_NOTIFY)
> + pm_runtime_put(&client->adapter->dev);
>
> return status;
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Thanks guys, I've tested the patch and can confirm it fixes the issue.
