Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/89] 5.0.11-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/89] 5.0.11-stable review
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 08:44:15 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lkft-triage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190502053039.GB419@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559>
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:00:39AM +0530, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> Built and booted on my x86 machine. No dmesg regression.

Thanks for testing two of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

References:
- [PATCH 5.0 00/89] 5.0.11-stable review
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/89] 5.0.11-stable review
  - From: Bharath Vedartham

Prev by Date: [PATCH v7 11/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel: Return -E2BIG when the transfer is incomplete
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/89] 5.0.11-stable review
Next by thread: [PATCH 4.19 000/100] 4.19.38-stable review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux