On 12/19/2013 09:07 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Likewise, having a barrier before the MONITOR looks sensible as well. > Having it _after_ monitor looks weird and is probably wrong. [It might > have been the effects of someone seeing the spurious wakeup problems > with realizing the true source, or so.] > Does anyone know the history of this barrier after the monitor? I know Len is looking for a minimal patchset that can go into -stable, and it seems prudent to not preturb the code more than necessary, but going forward it would be nice to know... -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html