On 2019-04-24 02:43, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:54:47PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote: >> On 2019-04-09 15:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> What's the status of this patch now? It's needed in linux-5.0.y as TPM >>>> 2.0 support is currently broken with those stable kernels without this >>>> commit. >>> >>> part of a PR. >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20190329115544.GA27351@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >>> >> >> It appears that the final version of the patch that was merged to >> Linus's tree [1] does not include the "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" tag. >> If I understand correctly, this means that the patch will not be >> automatically included in the -stable tree without further action. Is >> there a specific reason not to apply this patch to 5.0.x, or did the tag >> just get lost in the merge process? > > Good catch; I see that Jarkko had the same comment on v3 but v4 ended up > being without the -stable tag without any explanation. I've queued this > for 5.0, it doesn't seem relevant for older branches. Thank you! Correct, the regression only affects 5.0. Regards, Jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
