Re: [PATCH v3] signal: trace_signal_deliver when signal_group_exit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:25 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 04/22, Zhenliang Wei wrote:
>>
>> --- a/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -2441,6 +2441,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
>>  	if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
>>  		ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
>>  		sigdelset(&current->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
>> +		trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, SIG_DFL);
>>  		recalc_sigpending();
>>  		goto fatal;
>>  	}
>
>Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Last time Oleg suggested using SIG_DFL as the third parameter, but its type is 'void (*)(int)', but not expected 'struct k_sigaction *'.

How about
	trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, &sighand->action[signr - 1]);
?

Although we know that action[SIGKILL] must be SIG_DFL, in order to adapt to the parameter type, I suggest to use the original variable value.

Zhenliang Wei.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux