On Mon 2019-04-15 13:18:56, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:04 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 2019-04-15 20:58:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > [ Upstream commit 7ee18d677989e99635027cee04c878950e0752b9 ]
> > >
> > > My previous attempt to fix a couple of bugs in __restore_processor_context():
> > >
> > > 5b06bbcfc2c6 ("x86/power: Fix some ordering bugs in __restore_processor_context()")
> > >
> > > ... introduced yet another bug, breaking suspend-resume.
> > >
> > > Rather than trying to come up with a minimal fix, let's try to clean it up
> > > for real. This patch fixes quite a few things:
> >
> > 5b06bbcfc2c6 fixed theoretical bug; rather than porting it to stable
> > than fixing it up, it would be better not to port it to stable in the
> > first place or simply revert it there.
>
> Are you sure about that? The bug was reported by real users who had
> their systems really crash:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=0fede9f9-88b0-a6e7-1027-dfb2019b8ef2%40linux.intel.com
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwsMuHUBQz5kDNwRf17JnasXMWjvmLq5qXGH-694yeq1w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> And we had a report that the bug got backported:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20190407160005.djiw4reapwvbxmgo@debian/
>
> And if we're going to backport some of the fix, we should definitely
> backport the whole set to avoid having the -stable kernels be in a
> state that was never in any released kernel.
I agree it should be all or nothing. And I may have been slightly
confused.
Anyway: 5b06bbcfc2c6 is fix for ca37e57bbe0cf, and that one is for
"mostly harmless warning" (quoting changelog). ca37e57bbe0cf is not
present in 4.4.178, I believe best solution is not to add that one in
the first place, so we don't have to fix it up.
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
