ср, 10 апр. 2019 г. в 19:21, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > Add support to pass a blob to the server in FSCTL passthrough. > > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > fs/cifs/smbfsctl.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c > index 83a100dd2497..bb7522b882ea 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c > @@ -1382,6 +1382,18 @@ smb2_ioctl_query_info(const unsigned int xid, > oparms.fid = &fid; > oparms.reconnect = false; > > + /* > + * FSCTL codes encode the special access they need in the fsctl code. > + */ > + if (qi.flags & PASSTHRU_FSCTL) { > + switch (qi.info_type & FSCTL_DEVICE_ACCESS_MASK) { > + case FSCTL_DEVICE_ACCESS_FILE_READ_WRITE_ACCESS: > + oparms.desired_access = FILE_READ_DATA | FILE_WRITE_DATA | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES | SYNCHRONIZE; > + ; This extra ":" looks unnecessary. Don't we need to add cases for +#define FSCTL_DEVICE_ACCESS_FILE_ANY_ACCESS (0x00 << 14) +#define FSCTL_DEVICE_ACCESS_FILE_READ_ACCESS (0x01 << 14) +#define FSCTL_DEVICE_ACCESS_FILE_WRITE_ACCESS (0x02 << 14) ? -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky