On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 07:45:05PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > Hi Sasha, > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 9:45 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > [This is an automated email] > > > > This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. > > The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all > > > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.0.5, v4.19.32, v4.14.109, v4.9.166, v4.4.177, v3.18.137. > > > > v5.0.5: Build OK! > > v4.19.32: Build OK! > > v4.14.109: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:... > > v4.9.166: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:... > > v4.4.177: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:... > > v3.18.137: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:... > > > > How should we proceed with this patch? > > As highlighted in the stable notes for the series, the regression > happened in 4.15, sounds like I should have added some `# 4.15.x` > after the stable cc? > > So we are ok with having the series applied to 4.19 and 5.0 only. That is fine, thanks! greg k-h
