4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 5fb5caee92ba35a4a3baa61d45a78eb057e2c031 upstream. Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence to follow the specs. For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence: - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux) - N116BGE (Innolux) - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux) - B101EAN0 (Auo) - B101AW03 (Auo) - LTN101NT05 (Samsung) - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa) Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c @@ -54,10 +54,11 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struc if (err < 0) dev_err(pb->dev, "failed to enable power supply\n"); + pwm_enable(pb->pwm); + if (pb->enable_gpio) gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 1); - pwm_enable(pb->pwm); pb->enabled = true; } @@ -66,12 +67,12 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(stru if (!pb->enabled) return; - pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); - pwm_disable(pb->pwm); - if (pb->enable_gpio) gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 0); + pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); + pwm_disable(pb->pwm); + regulator_disable(pb->power_supply); pb->enabled = false; }
