4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@xxxxxxxxx>
commit e20a2e9c42c9e4002d9e338d74e7819e88d77162 upstream.
When releasing socket, it is possible to enter hci_sock_release() and
hci_sock_dev_event(HCI_DEV_UNREG) at the same time in different thread.
The reference count of hdev should be decremented only once from one of
them but if storing hdev to local variable in hci_sock_release() before
detached from socket and setting to NULL in hci_sock_dev_event(),
hci_dev_put(hdev) is unexpectedly called twice. This is resolved by
referencing hdev from socket after bt_sock_unlink() in
hci_sock_release().
Reported-by: syzbot+fdc00003f4efff43bc5b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -826,8 +826,6 @@ static int hci_sock_release(struct socke
if (!sk)
return 0;
- hdev = hci_pi(sk)->hdev;
-
switch (hci_pi(sk)->channel) {
case HCI_CHANNEL_MONITOR:
atomic_dec(&monitor_promisc);
@@ -849,6 +847,7 @@ static int hci_sock_release(struct socke
bt_sock_unlink(&hci_sk_list, sk);
+ hdev = hci_pi(sk)->hdev;
if (hdev) {
if (hci_pi(sk)->channel == HCI_CHANNEL_USER) {
/* When releasing an user channel exclusive access,
