5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 89dc891792c2e046b030f87600109c22209da32e upstream. The lpi_range_list is supposed to be sorted in ascending order of ->base_id (at least if the range merging is to work), but the current comparison function returns a positive value if rb->base_id > ra->base_id, which means that list_sort() will put A after B in that case - and vice versa, of course. Fixes: 880cb3cddd16 (irqchip/gic-v3-its: Refactor LPI allocator) Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (v4.19+) Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -1482,7 +1482,7 @@ static int lpi_range_cmp(void *priv, str ra = container_of(a, struct lpi_range, entry); rb = container_of(b, struct lpi_range, entry); - return rb->base_id - ra->base_id; + return ra->base_id - rb->base_id; } static void merge_lpi_ranges(void)
