Re: [net 2/2] igb: Fix for issue where values could be too high for udelay function.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On 12/14/2013 02:26 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:

From: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch changes the igb_phy_has_link function to check the value of the
parameter before deciding to use udelay or mdelay in order to be sure that
the value is not too high for udelay function.

CC: stable kernel <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9+
Signed-off-by: Sunil K Pandey <sunil.k.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kevin B Smith <kevin.b.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c
index c4c4fe3..ad2b74d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c
@@ -1728,7 +1728,10 @@ s32 igb_phy_has_link(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,
  			 * ownership of the resources, wait and try again to
  			 * see if they have relinquished the resources yet.
  			 */
-			udelay(usec_interval);
+			if (usec_interval >= 1000)
+				mdelay(usec_interval/1000);

There should be spaces around / at least for consistency with the previous line. Also, are you sure it shouldn't be mdelay(DIV_ROUND_UP(usec_interval, 1000))?

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]