On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:46:54PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013, 20:27:02 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:52:53PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013, 10:08:47 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > > > > > > > > > > > me know. > > > > > > > > > > Objections... well... I'm not sure if it meets stable criteria. In > > > > > particular, I don't think it was ever demonstrated as having bad > > > > > effect on the users. > > > > > > > > Well, I'm guessing someone on the cc: here wanted it in stable@, so > > > > I'll let them speak up as to why... > > > > > > As for bad effects on users ... any suspend_noirq callback returning an > > > error and thus aborting the suspend will cause the error fixed by this, > > > as the early-irqs won't get reenabled in the suspend-rollback [due to > > > the syscore_ops doing their resume never being run]. > > > > > > You could for example lose keys connected thru the gpio-keys driver until > > > the next reboot. > > > > > > And it seems at least Laxman and myself were affected by it. > > > > So, to be clear, this patch fixes a problem on your machines, right? > > yes it does fix a problem I ran into on my machines. Great, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html