4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit a799aea0988ea0d1b1f263e996fdad2f6133c680 ]
Using the following example:
client 1.1.1.7 ---> 2.2.2.7 which dnat to 10.0.0.7 server
The first reply packet (ie. syn+ack) uses an incorrect destination
address for the reverse route lookup since it uses:
daddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.ip;
which is 2.2.2.7 in the scenario that is described above, while this
should be:
daddr = ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.ip;
that is 10.0.0.7.
Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
index 974525eb92df7..ccdb8f5ababbe 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ static int nft_flow_route(const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt,
memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
switch (nft_pf(pkt)) {
case NFPROTO_IPV4:
- fl.u.ip4.daddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.ip;
+ fl.u.ip4.daddr = ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.ip;
break;
case NFPROTO_IPV6:
- fl.u.ip6.daddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.in6;
+ fl.u.ip6.daddr = ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.in6;
break;
}
--
2.19.1
