----- On Feb 22, 2019, at 3:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 07:25:50AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 07:17:11PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> > ----- On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:10 PM, Russell King, ARM Linux linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:02:57PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> > >> Hi Arnd, Russell, Linus, >> > >> >> > >> Can we ensure the arm32 kprobes fix I submitted gets upstream before 5.0 final ? >> > >> It takes care of an illegal instruction issue with optimized kprobes on arm32. >> > >> >> > >> Here is the current state of default kprobes configuration on arm32: >> > >> using them will trigger illegal instruction OOPS on v5.0-rc7, 4.19.24, >> > >> v4.14.102. >> > >> >> > >> My fix is in "accepted" state in the arm patch tracking system: >> > >> >> > >> https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8834/1 >> > >> >> > >> Should I send it directly to Linus as well ? >> > > >> > > Accepted means it's in my tree pending to be sent to Linus. It should >> > > now be in mainline. Have you checked? >> > >> > Hrm, why did I not see it earlier today... it's embarrassing. >> > >> > It's there indeed, all is good! >> > >> > Greg, you should be able to pick it into the stable kernels now. >> >> What is the git commit id of it? > > Oh nevermind, I see it. I'll queue it up for the next round of kernel > releases after this one. Sorry about late reply, it's indeed commit 0ac569bf6a79 ("ARM: 8834/1: Fix: kprobes: optimized kprobes illegal instruction") upstream. Thanks! Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
