4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb upstream. Vince (and later on Ravi) reported crashes in the BTS code during fuzzing with the following backtrace: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI ... RIP: 0010:perf_prepare_sample+0x8f/0x510 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> ? intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer+0x194/0x230 intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer+0x160/0x230 ? tick_nohz_irq_exit+0x31/0x40 ? smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x48/0xe0 ? call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 ? call_function_single_interrupt+0xa/0x20 ? x86_schedule_events+0x1a0/0x2f0 ? x86_pmu_commit_txn+0xb4/0x100 ? find_busiest_group+0x47/0x5d0 ? perf_event_set_state.part.42+0x12/0x50 ? perf_mux_hrtimer_restart+0x40/0xb0 intel_pmu_disable_event+0xae/0x100 ? intel_pmu_disable_event+0xae/0x100 x86_pmu_stop+0x7a/0xb0 x86_pmu_del+0x57/0x120 event_sched_out.isra.101+0x83/0x180 group_sched_out.part.103+0x57/0xe0 ctx_sched_out+0x188/0x240 ctx_resched+0xa8/0xd0 __perf_event_enable+0x193/0x1e0 event_function+0x8e/0xc0 remote_function+0x41/0x50 flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x68/0x100 generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x30 smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x3e/0xe0 call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> The reason is that while event init code does several checks for BTS events and prevents several unwanted config bits for BTS event (like precise_ip), the PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD allows to create BTS event without those checks being done. Following sequence will cause the crash: If we create an 'almost' BTS event with precise_ip and callchains, and it into a BTS event it will crash the perf_prepare_sample() function because precise_ip events are expected to come in with callchain data initialized, but that's not the case for intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer() caller. Adding a check_period callback to be called before the period is changed via PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD. It will deny the change if the event would become BTS. Plus adding also the limit_period check as well. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190204123532.GA4794@krava Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/events/core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 16 ++++++++++++++-- include/linux/perf_event.h | 5 +++++ kernel/events/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c @@ -2196,6 +2196,19 @@ void perf_check_microcode(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_check_microcode); +static int x86_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value) +{ + if (x86_pmu.check_period && x86_pmu.check_period(event, value)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (value && x86_pmu.limit_period) { + if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, value) > value) + return -EINVAL; + } + + return 0; +} + static struct pmu pmu = { .pmu_enable = x86_pmu_enable, .pmu_disable = x86_pmu_disable, @@ -2220,6 +2233,7 @@ static struct pmu pmu = { .event_idx = x86_pmu_event_idx, .sched_task = x86_pmu_sched_task, .task_ctx_size = sizeof(struct x86_perf_task_context), + .check_period = x86_pmu_check_period, }; void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event, --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -3262,6 +3262,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_sched_task(struct intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(ctx, sched_in); } +static int intel_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value) +{ + return intel_pmu_has_bts_period(event, value) ? -EINVAL : 0; +} + PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(offcore_rsp, "config1:0-63"); PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(ldlat, "config1:0-15"); @@ -3328,6 +3333,8 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu .cpu_starting = intel_pmu_cpu_starting, .cpu_dying = intel_pmu_cpu_dying, .cpu_dead = intel_pmu_cpu_dead, + + .check_period = intel_pmu_check_period, }; static __initconst const struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = { @@ -3367,6 +3374,8 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu .guest_get_msrs = intel_guest_get_msrs, .sched_task = intel_pmu_sched_task, + + .check_period = intel_pmu_check_period, }; static __init void intel_clovertown_quirk(void) --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h @@ -626,6 +626,11 @@ struct x86_pmu { * Intel host/guest support (KVM) */ struct perf_guest_switch_msr *(*guest_get_msrs)(int *nr); + + /* + * Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl. + */ + int (*check_period) (struct perf_event *event, u64 period); }; struct x86_perf_task_context { @@ -833,7 +838,7 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL -static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event) +static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 period) { struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; unsigned int hw_event, bts_event; @@ -844,7 +849,14 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(str hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK; bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS); - return hw_event == bts_event && hwc->sample_period == 1; + return hw_event == bts_event && period == 1; +} + +static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event) +{ + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; + + return intel_pmu_has_bts_period(event, hwc->sample_period); } int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event); --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -455,6 +455,11 @@ struct pmu { * Filter events for PMU-specific reasons. */ int (*filter_match) (struct perf_event *event); /* optional */ + + /* + * Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl. + */ + int (*check_period) (struct perf_event *event, u64 value); /* optional */ }; /** --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4600,6 +4600,11 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct p } } +static int perf_event_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value) +{ + return event->pmu->check_period(event, value); +} + static int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 __user *arg) { u64 value; @@ -4616,6 +4621,9 @@ static int perf_event_period(struct perf if (event->attr.freq && value > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate) return -EINVAL; + if (perf_event_check_period(event, value)) + return -EINVAL; + event_function_call(event, __perf_event_period, &value); return 0; @@ -8622,6 +8630,11 @@ static int perf_pmu_nop_int(struct pmu * return 0; } +static int perf_event_nop_int(struct perf_event *event, u64 value) +{ + return 0; +} + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nop_txn_flags); static void perf_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int flags) @@ -8944,6 +8957,9 @@ got_cpu_context: pmu->pmu_disable = perf_pmu_nop_void; } + if (!pmu->check_period) + pmu->check_period = perf_event_nop_int; + if (!pmu->event_idx) pmu->event_idx = perf_event_idx_default;
