4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Petr Machata <petrm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit c1f7e02979edd7a3a3e69fe04be60b1d650dc8a7 ]
In fl_change(), when adding a new rule (i.e. fold == NULL), a driver may
reject the new rule, for example due to resource exhaustion. By that
point, the new rule was already assigned a mask, and it was added to
that mask's hash table. The clean-up path that's invoked as a result of
the rejection however neglects to undo the hash table addition, and
proceeds to free the new rule, thus leaving a dangling pointer in the
hash table.
Fix by removing fnew from the mask's hash table before it is freed.
Fixes: 35cc3cefc4de ("net/sched: cls_flower: Reject duplicated rules also under skip_sw")
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sched/cls_flower.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, st
if (!tc_skip_hw(fnew->flags)) {
err = fl_hw_replace_filter(tp, fnew, extack);
if (err)
- goto errout_mask;
+ goto errout_mask_ht;
}
if (!tc_in_hw(fnew->flags))
@@ -1287,6 +1287,10 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, st
kfree(mask);
return 0;
+errout_mask_ht:
+ rhashtable_remove_fast(&fnew->mask->ht, &fnew->ht_node,
+ fnew->mask->filter_ht_params);
+
errout_mask:
fl_mask_put(head, fnew->mask, false);
