4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit f6176473a0c7472380eef72ebeb330cf9485bf0a ]
When call f2fs_acl_create_masq() failed, the caller f2fs_acl_create()
should return -EIO instead of -ENOMEM, this patch makes it consistent
with posix_acl_create() which has been fixed in commit beaf226b863a
("posix_acl: don't ignore return value of posix_acl_create_masq()").
Fixes: 83dfe53c185e ("f2fs: fix reference leaks in f2fs_acl_create")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <kernelpatch@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/acl.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/acl.c b/fs/f2fs/acl.c
index 55aa29c0c78d..a9894089d9dc 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/acl.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/acl.c
@@ -348,12 +348,14 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
return PTR_ERR(p);
clone = f2fs_acl_clone(p, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!clone)
- goto no_mem;
+ if (!clone) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto release_acl;
+ }
ret = f2fs_acl_create_masq(clone, mode);
if (ret < 0)
- goto no_mem_clone;
+ goto release_clone;
if (ret == 0)
posix_acl_release(clone);
@@ -367,11 +369,11 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
return 0;
-no_mem_clone:
+release_clone:
posix_acl_release(clone);
-no_mem:
+release_acl:
posix_acl_release(p);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return ret;
}
int f2fs_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, struct page *ipage,
--
2.19.1
