On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 08:32:01AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:48:29AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:06:55AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > Kernel stable team, > > > > > > > > here is a v2 respin of my XFS stable patches for v4.19.y. The only > > > > change in this series is adding the upstream commit to the commit log, > > > > and I've now also Cc'd stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as well. No other issues > > > > were spotted or raised with this series. > > > > > > > > Reviews, questions, or rants are greatly appreciated. > > > > > > Test results? > > > > > > The set of changes look fine themselves, but as always, the proof is > > > in the testing... > > > > I've first established a baseline for v4.19.18 with fstests using > > a series of different sections to test against. I annotated the > > failures on an expunge list and then use that expunge list to confirm > > no regressions -- no failures if we skip the failures already known for > > v4.19.18. > > > > Each different configuration I test against I use a section for. I only > > test x86_64 for now but am starting to create a baseline for ppc64le. > > > > The sections I use: > > > > * xfs > > * xfs_nocrc > > * xfs_nocrc_512 > > * xfs_reflink > > * xfs_reflink_1024 > > * xfs_logdev > > * xfs_realtimedev > > Yup, that seems to cover most common things :) To be clear in the future I hope to also have a baseline for: * xfs_bigblock But that is *currently* [0] only possible on the following architectures with the respective kernel config: aarch64: CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y ppc64le: CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES=y [0] Someone is working on 64k pages on x86 I think? Luis
