On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:49:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:33 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Thus, it makes sense to fix this also in tpm_crb, not least because > > the fix can be then backported to stable kernels and make them more robust > > when compiled in differing environments. > > Ack, looks sane to me, and should help both the backport and probably > generate better code too. > > In the meantime, I've committed the iomem.c change with a *long* > commit message. For all we know, there might be other cases like this > lurking somewhere else that just happened to work. Plus it's the right > thing to do anyway. > > Linus Great! Umh, so, should my tpm_crb change committed to 5.0 with the minor changes implemented suggested by Tomas or not? Can also include it to my 5.1 PR. Either WFM. /Jarkko
