4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: George Amanakis <gamanakis@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3a03cb8456cc1d61c467a5375e0a10e5207b948c ]
Call tun_set_real_num_queues() after the increment of tun->numqueues
since the former depends on it. Otherwise, the number of queues is not
correctly accounted for, which results to warnings similar to:
"vnet0 selects TX queue 11, but real number of TX queues is 11".
Fixes: 0b7959b62573 ("tun: publish tfile after it's fully initialized")
Reported-and-tested-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -862,8 +862,6 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct
if (rtnl_dereference(tun->xdp_prog))
sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_XDP);
- tun_set_real_num_queues(tun);
-
/* device is allowed to go away first, so no need to hold extra
* refcnt.
*/
@@ -875,6 +873,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct
rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile);
tun->numqueues++;
+ tun_set_real_num_queues(tun);
out:
return err;
}
