4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d4a7e9bb74b5aaf07b89f6531c080b1130bdf019 ]
I realized the last patch calls dev_get_by_index_rcu in a branch not
holding the rcu lock. Add the calls to rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock.
Fixes: ec90ad334986 ("ipv6: Consider sk_bound_dev_if when binding a socket to a v4 mapped address")
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
@@ -317,17 +317,20 @@ int inet6_bind(struct socket *sock, stru
goto out;
}
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if) {
dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
if (!dev) {
err = -ENODEV;
- goto out;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
}
/* Reproduce AF_INET checks to make the bindings consistent */
v4addr = addr->sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3];
chk_addr_ret = inet_addr_type_dev_table(net, dev, v4addr);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
if (!net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_nonlocal_bind &&
!(inet->freebind || inet->transparent) &&
v4addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY) &&
