On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 15:55 +-0000, Sasha Levin wrote: +AD4 +AFs-This is an automated email+AF0 +AD4 +AD4 This commit has been processed because it contains a +ACI-Fixes:+ACI tag, +AD4 fixing commit: 94a9174c630c IB/srp: reduce lock coverage of command completion. +AD4 +AD4 The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.3, v4.19.16, v4.14.94, v4.9.151, v4.4.171, v3.18.132. +AD4 +AD4 v4.20.3: Build OK+ACE +AD4 v4.19.16: Build OK+ACE +AD4 v4.14.94: Build OK+ACE +AD4 v4.9.151: Build failed+ACE Errors: +AD4 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib+AF8-srp.c:2657:2: error: implicit declaration of function +IBg-blk+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-start+IBkAOw did you mean +IBg-blk+AF8-mq+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-start+IBk? +AFs--Werror+AD0-implicit-function-declaration+AF0 +AD4 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib+AF8-srp.c:2658:14: error: implicit declaration of function +IBg-blk+AF8-mq+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-wait+AF8-timeout+IBkAOw did you mean +IBg-blk+AF8-mq+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-start+IBk? +AFs--Werror+AD0-implicit-function- +AD4 declaration+AF0 +AD4 +AD4 v4.4.171: Build failed+ACE Errors: +AD4 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib+AF8-srp.c:2612:2: error: implicit declaration of function +IBg-blk+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-start+IBkAOw did you mean +IBg-blk+AF8-mq+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-start+IBk? +AFs--Werror+AD0-implicit-function-declaration+AF0 +AD4 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib+AF8-srp.c:2613:14: error: implicit declaration of function +IBg-blk+AF8-mq+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-wait+AF8-timeout+IBkAOw did you mean +IBg-blk+AF8-mq+AF8-freeze+AF8-queue+AF8-start+IBk? +AFs--Werror+AD0-implicit-function- +AD4 declaration+AF0 +AD4 +AD4 v3.18.132: Failed to apply+ACE Possible dependencies: +AD4 205619f2f824 (+ACI-IB/srp: Remove stale connection retry mechanism+ACI) +AD4 34aa654ecb8e (+ACI-IB/srp: Avoid that I/O hangs due to a cable pull during LUN scanning+ACI) +AD4 394c595ee8c3 (+ACI-IB/srp: Move ib+AF8-destroy+AF8-cm+AF8-id() call into srp+AF8-free+AF8-ch+AF8-ib()+ACI) +AD4 509c07bc1850 (+ACI-IB/srp: Separate target and channel variables+ACI) +AD4 747fe000ef38 (+ACI-IB/srp: Introduce two new srp+AF8-target+AF8-port member variables+ACI) +AD4 77f2c1a40e6f (+ACI-IB/srp: Use block layer tags+ACI) +AD4 d92c0da71a35 (+ACI-IB/srp: Add multichannel support+ACI) +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 How should we proceed with this patch? Hi Sasha, Patch 2/2 does not have a +ACI-Cc: stable+ACI tag because it definitely should NOT be backported to older kernels. This patch only works for blk-mq which is fine with kernel v5.0. Older kernels however support both the legacy block layer and blk-mq. Bart.
