4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
commit 967d1dc144b50ad005e5eecdfadfbcfb399ffff6 upstream.
__loop_release() has a single call site. Fold it there. This is
currently not a huge win but it will make following replacement of
loop_index_mutex more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1603,12 +1603,15 @@ out:
return err;
}
-static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
+static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
{
+ struct loop_device *lo;
int err;
+ mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+ lo = disk->private_data;
if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
- return;
+ goto unlock_index;
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
@@ -1618,7 +1621,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev
*/
err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
if (!err)
- return;
+ goto unlock_index;
} else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
/*
* Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
@@ -1629,12 +1632,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev
}
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
-}
-
-static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
-{
- mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
- __lo_release(disk->private_data);
+unlock_index:
mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
}
