On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:56:08PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> > >> On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. > >>> There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>> let me know. > >>> > >>> Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. > >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >>> > >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1.gz > >>> or in the git tree and branch at: > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y > >>> and the diffstat can be found below. > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> > >>> greg k-h > >> All tests are passing for Tegra ... > >> > >> Test results for stable-v4.14: > >> 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail > >> 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail > >> 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail > >> > >> Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a > >> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, > >> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > > > Thanks for testing two of these. > > > > How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as > > well? :) > > We are not that advanced yet ;-) So not everything for those platforms is upstream? :( > Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards > supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing > mainline and -next. > > Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the > moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure > for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved. > However, nonetheless it is doable. > > We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not > sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just > wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19? I was just curious, if everything was upstream (like the boards that linaro tests for), then running 4.19 should be just the same as 4.20. But if you have big out-of-tree patchsets, that's a totally different story. thanks, greg k-h
