4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 1ba98d086fe3a14d6a31f2f66dbab70c45d00f63 upstream. Right now we treat leaf which has zero item as a valid one because we could have an empty tree, that is, a root that is also a leaf without any item, however, in the same case but when the leaf is not a root, we can end up with hitting the BUG_ON(1) in btrfs_extend_item() called by setup_inline_extent_backref(). This makes us check the situation as a corruption if leaf is not its own root. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -535,8 +535,29 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct bt u32 nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf); int slot; - if (nritems == 0) + if (nritems == 0) { + struct btrfs_root *check_root; + + key.objectid = btrfs_header_owner(leaf); + key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY; + key.offset = (u64)-1; + + check_root = btrfs_get_fs_root(root->fs_info, &key, false); + /* + * The only reason we also check NULL here is that during + * open_ctree() some roots has not yet been set up. + */ + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(check_root)) { + /* if leaf is the root, then it's fine */ + if (leaf->start != + btrfs_root_bytenr(&check_root->root_item)) { + CORRUPT("non-root leaf's nritems is 0", + leaf, root, 0); + return -EIO; + } + } return 0; + } /* Check the 0 item */ if (btrfs_item_offset_nr(leaf, 0) + btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, 0) !=