[PATCH 4.4 30/51] btrfs: Verify that every chunk has corresponding block group at mount time

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>

commit 7ef49515fa6727cb4b6f2f5b0ffbc5fc20a9f8c6 upstream.

If a crafted image has missing block group items, it could cause
unexpected behavior and breaks the assumption of 1:1 chunk<->block group
mapping.

Although we have the block group -> chunk mapping check, we still need
chunk -> block group mapping check.

This patch will do extra check to ensure each chunk has its
corresponding block group.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 4.4: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -9765,6 +9765,62 @@ btrfs_create_block_group_cache(struct bt
 	return cache;
 }
 
+
+/*
+ * Iterate all chunks and verify that each of them has the corresponding block
+ * group
+ */
+static int check_chunk_block_group_mappings(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+	struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
+	struct extent_map *em;
+	struct btrfs_block_group_cache *bg;
+	u64 start = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	while (1) {
+		read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+		/*
+		 * lookup_extent_mapping will return the first extent map
+		 * intersecting the range, so setting @len to 1 is enough to
+		 * get the first chunk.
+		 */
+		em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, start, 1);
+		read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock);
+		if (!em)
+			break;
+
+		bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, em->start);
+		if (!bg) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+	"chunk start=%llu len=%llu doesn't have corresponding block group",
+				     em->start, em->len);
+			ret = -EUCLEAN;
+			free_extent_map(em);
+			break;
+		}
+		if (bg->key.objectid != em->start ||
+		    bg->key.offset != em->len ||
+		    (bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) !=
+		    (em->map_lookup->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK)) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+"chunk start=%llu len=%llu flags=0x%llx doesn't match block group start=%llu len=%llu flags=0x%llx",
+				em->start, em->len,
+				em->map_lookup->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK,
+				bg->key.objectid, bg->key.offset,
+				bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK);
+			ret = -EUCLEAN;
+			free_extent_map(em);
+			btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
+			break;
+		}
+		start = em->start + em->len;
+		free_extent_map(em);
+		btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
 {
 	struct btrfs_path *path;
@@ -9951,7 +10007,7 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs
 	}
 
 	init_global_block_rsv(info);
-	ret = 0;
+	ret = check_chunk_block_group_mappings(info);
 error:
 	btrfs_free_path(path);
 	return ret;