Changes since v1 [1]: * Include another patch make sure that function-number zero can be safely used as an invalid function number (Jeff) * Add a comment clarifying why zero is an invalid function number (Jeff) * Pass nfit_mem to cmd_to_func() (Jeff) * Collect a Tested-by from Sujith [1]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2019-January/019435.html --- Quote patch2 changelog: The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. --- Dan Williams (2): acpi/nfit: Block function zero DSMs acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
