[PATCH 3.11 123/272] dm array: fix bug in growing array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



3.11.10.1 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9c1d4de56066e4d6abc66ec188faafd7b303fb08 upstream.

Entries would be lost if the old tail block was partially filled.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c
index 172147e..af96e24 100644
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c
@@ -509,15 +509,18 @@ static int grow_add_tail_block(struct resize *resize)
 static int grow_needs_more_blocks(struct resize *resize)
 {
 	int r;
+	unsigned old_nr_blocks = resize->old_nr_full_blocks;
 
 	if (resize->old_nr_entries_in_last_block > 0) {
+		old_nr_blocks++;
+
 		r = grow_extend_tail_block(resize, resize->max_entries);
 		if (r)
 			return r;
 	}
 
 	r = insert_full_ablocks(resize->info, resize->size_of_block,
-				resize->old_nr_full_blocks,
+				old_nr_blocks,
 				resize->new_nr_full_blocks,
 				resize->max_entries, resize->value,
 				&resize->root);
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]