4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit c01ac66b38660f2b507ccd0b75d28e3002d56fbb ]
The message got changed a lot time ago.
This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64.
Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 041dbbb30ff0..a0591d06c61b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -8070,7 +8070,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
- strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
+ strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
if (reject_from_alignment) {
printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
--
2.19.1
