On Mi, 2018-12-19 at 12:03 +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote: > On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 10:31 +0700, Lars Melin wrote: > > On 12/19/2018 10:16, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > > > Hi Macpaul, > > your verbose usb listing show me that Mediatek has made two different > > 0e8d:003 devices, see my verbose lsusb listing below. > > (Notice also the reverse order for cmd and data interfaces in it > > compared to yours). > > USB id's are intended to identify a device and its needs so there should > > never be more than one unique device per id. > > > > > > Fairphone FP-1, MT6227 (no CDC union !!!) > > > > Hi Lars, > > Ha ha ha, it is a little bit embarrassing. > What I've used to capture verbose log is MT6765 platform. > Then I've checked Fairphone FP-1, which is MT6589 a pretty old platform. > The BROM (boot ROM) has been maintained by other teams and will vary by > different SoC project in Mediatek. I'm not sure why they changed the > descriptors. > > For the consistency of BROM's behavior, I'll update a new patch keeps > PID:0003 remain untouched. I'll trying to report it to BROM team and see > if they have any action on this issue. Thank you all for taking care of these important issues. Please submit that new patch. Regards Oliver
