4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit c9287fa657b3328b4549c0ab39ea7f197a3d6a50 ]
list_for_each_entry_safe() is not safe for deleting entries from the
list if the spin lock, which protects it, is released and reacquired during
the list iteration. Fix this issue by replacing this construction with
a simple check if list is empty and removing the first entry in each
iteration. This is almost equivalent to a revert of the commit mentioned in
the Fixes: tag.
This patch fixes following issue:
--->8---
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000104
pgd = (ptrval)
[00000104] *pgd=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 817 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 84 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc2-next-20181114-00009-g8266b35ec404 #1061
Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
Workqueue: events eth_work
PC is at rx_fill+0x60/0xac
LR is at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c
pc : [<c065fee0>] lr : [<c0a056b8>] psr: 80000093
sp : ee7fbee8 ip : 00000100 fp : 00000000
r10: 006000c0 r9 : c10b0ab0 r8 : ee7eb5c0
r7 : ee7eb614 r6 : ee7eb5ec r5 : 000000dc r4 : ee12ac00
r3 : ee12ac24 r2 : 00000200 r1 : 60000013 r0 : ee7eb5ec
Flags: Nzcv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
Control: 10c5387d Table: 6d5dc04a DAC: 00000051
Process kworker/1:1 (pid: 84, stack limit = 0x(ptrval))
Stack: (0xee7fbee8 to 0xee7fc000)
...
[<c065fee0>] (rx_fill) from [<c0143b7c>] (process_one_work+0x200/0x738)
[<c0143b7c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0144118>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x4c8)
[<c0144118>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a8a4>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
[<c014a8a4>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
Exception stack(0xee7fbfb0 to 0xee7fbff8)
...
---[ end trace 64480bc835eba7d6 ]---
Fixes: fea14e68ff5e ("usb: gadget: u_ether: use better list accessors")
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
index bdbc3fdc7c4f..3a0e4f5d7b83 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
@@ -405,12 +405,12 @@ static int alloc_requests(struct eth_dev *dev, struct gether *link, unsigned n)
static void rx_fill(struct eth_dev *dev, gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
struct usb_request *req;
- struct usb_request *tmp;
unsigned long flags;
/* fill unused rxq slots with some skb */
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->req_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &dev->rx_reqs, list) {
+ while (!list_empty(&dev->rx_reqs)) {
+ req = list_first_entry(&dev->rx_reqs, struct usb_request, list);
list_del_init(&req->list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->req_lock, flags);
@@ -1125,7 +1125,6 @@ void gether_disconnect(struct gether *link)
{
struct eth_dev *dev = link->ioport;
struct usb_request *req;
- struct usb_request *tmp;
WARN_ON(!dev);
if (!dev)
@@ -1142,7 +1141,8 @@ void gether_disconnect(struct gether *link)
*/
usb_ep_disable(link->in_ep);
spin_lock(&dev->req_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &dev->tx_reqs, list) {
+ while (!list_empty(&dev->tx_reqs)) {
+ req = list_first_entry(&dev->tx_reqs, struct usb_request, list);
list_del(&req->list);
spin_unlock(&dev->req_lock);
@@ -1154,7 +1154,8 @@ void gether_disconnect(struct gether *link)
usb_ep_disable(link->out_ep);
spin_lock(&dev->req_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &dev->rx_reqs, list) {
+ while (!list_empty(&dev->rx_reqs)) {
+ req = list_first_entry(&dev->rx_reqs, struct usb_request, list);
list_del(&req->list);
spin_unlock(&dev->req_lock);
--
2.19.1
